Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:44:31 -0700, Andy Brown wrote:
Who had the "bright" idea to require the non-removable extensions in 
LibreOffice?  This, IMO, is totally uncalled for.  This is a great way 
to lose users.

While I agree that there should be no non-removable extensions by
default, the tone of you email is pretty uncalled for as well. It sounds
arrogant and offends people who are working hard towards a better LO.

Sorry if my mail is harsh. But do try to be somewhat more polite towards
those doing actual development work. "Who never acts, makes no


Unsubscribe instructions: Email to
Posting guidelines:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.