On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:44:31 -0700, Andy Brown wrote:
Who had the "bright" idea to require the non-removable extensions in
LibreOffice? This, IMO, is totally uncalled for. This is a great way
to lose users.
While I agree that there should be no non-removable extensions by
default, the tone of you email is pretty uncalled for as well. It sounds
arrogant and offends people who are working hard towards a better LO.
Sorry if my mail is harsh. But do try to be somewhat more polite towards
those doing actual development work. "Who never acts, makes no
mistakes."
Thanks,
Sebastian
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
Re: [tdf-discuss] Non-removable extensions · Luis E Vásquez r
Re: [tdf-discuss] Non-removable extensions · Sebastian Spaeth
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.