Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 19 oct. 10, at 23:13, Cor Nouws wrote:

Joining the global users lists, gives the largest public, so more
knowledge / international exchange. I find that useful in some

That works only for people who understand English. So it is not
global by definition.

That is true, so a would show that difference.

Definitely. And too.

Mind that common is (was?) that there is for example
 an users@<language>
as well as
 a marketing or a dev@<language>
The place where people in a certain language area work together.

For English that obviously does not work, and for Spanish and maybe more languages too.
Therefore, we already see a list for a local/regional group in the US (iirc).

Indeed. But that is beside the point I am making.

_ALL_ lists should be identified by the language they use.

Unless the lists are clearly and exclusively about global policy issues, in which case they should 
_theorically_ be multilingual (ie not explicitly refuse contributions because some list members do 
not understand the language of the post).

Jean-Christophe Helary
work: (ja/en > fr)

E-mail to for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.