Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Sat Oct 16 2010 20:35:41 GMT-0700 (PDT)  Marc Paré wrote:

Thanks for the note. Yes, it does sound that different tools are needed depending on the field of study. There should almost be a mailist dedicated to LibO use for academia where we could collect the data needed to make LibO a great tool for academia. IMHO, LibO satisfies quie well in the educational arena, however it does fail somewhat for the needs of academia. Yes, I have found that in many instances complaints of failings in providing solid bibliographic support from professors who had tried OOo.

I think from a marketing point of view, these are areas where we should perhaps try to improve and involve devs who would be interested in these areas.

Not sure what to do about this information. Should this be information be collected in the Marketing list?

Suggestions anyone?

Why not add a section on the wiki, maybe under the marketing section for ideas and suggestions?

Just a though.

Andy


--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.