On 16/10/10 17:37, Kertesz Laszlo wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:25:46 +0300, AG
<computing.account@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 16/10/10 16:24, AG wrote:
On 16/10/10 12:36, Kertesz Laszlo wrote:
Hello,
You have to completely remove the installed LibreOffice version
(all lobasis* or libobasis* packages too)- there are some library
differences between beta 1 and 2. I had the same issue and i solved
it like that.
BTW, here is a LibreOffice Debian repo that seems to be up to date:
http://gericom.wordpress.com/2010/09/28/libre-office-openoffice-fork-sponsored-by-canonical-novell-google/
Have a nice day,
Kertesz Laszlo
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 14:21:45 +0300, AG
<computing.account@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi all
I dropped this into the thread on the beta 2 release, but that was
the wrong place and it subsequently got lost. So, to give it its
own thread just in case others need it in the future.
For my Debian system, I found
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/deb/x86/
and once I downloaded the relevant deb tarball I ran into some
difficulties installing it. I unpacked the tarball and ran, as
sudo, sh update.
The process kicked up some errors, which concerned the following
messages:
<snip>
Therefore:
(1) was running update the appropriate installation/ updating
method to install beta 2 and if not, what is? and/ or
(2) have these issues been reported by others using the debian
packages?
FWIW, I'm running an up-to-date Debian testing on a stand alone
machine. It has OOo and LibO beta 1 installed (& these actually
seem to co-exist quite happily).
Thank you for any ideas on how to install beta 2.
AG
Thanks for the suggestion - this I did, and still received the
following two errors:
Errors were encountered while processing:
en-US/DEBS/libobasis3.3-core01_3.3.0-9_i386.deb
en-US/DEBS/libobasis3.3-en-us_3.3.0-9_i386.deb
If the core1 doesn't install, it seems like the rest won't either!
I have now downloaded the package as Kertesz suggested and run sh
update.
Additional error messages are now that the application could not be
started because "iso resource could not be loaded by SfxApplicator".
WTF???
I'd appreciate any help on this please.
Cheers
AG
I dont know about that error, i never used the update script.
I just dpkg-ed all debs from the DEBS folder and the
DEBS/desktop-integration/ with the command (path is the path to the
unpacked .debs):
sudo dpkg -i /path/*.deb
Now i installed beta1 from the tar.gz from the site and beta2 from the
repository i mentioned. There were the library conflicts as AG
observed. I purged all libreoffice related stuff and i installed beta2
and all is well.
Kertesz
Thanks for the more detailed instructions which I have now successfully
followed.
The beta 2 now launches as expected without errors.
Thank you again!!
On a general note, I wonder if it would be worthwhile for the packagers
of LibO to (a) include installation instruction documentation somewhere
on their site where these can be easil;y found and used, and (b) to
develop a script that will actually perform the installation. While I
may not be the sharpest crayon in the pack, I obviously have had a fair
bit of problems installing this onto my machine and to be honest going
through this degree of hassle may well put some people off from even
trying it in the first place.
Once again, Kertesz, my gratitude for your help and patience.
Best wishes
AG
--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.