Le 2010-10-15 16:29, Mirek M. a écrit :
Hi Michel,
That gives me a lot to respond to -- I'll try to be as concise as possible.
a) Why the change in menu categorization? Because the old one wasn't good
enough. "File" contained tools that applied to both the currently-opened
file and to the office suite as a whole. "Edit" and "Tools" menus held
miscellaneous commands. There were commands under "Table" that weren't
specific to tables. It was a mess. But if anyone wants to revert back to the
classic UI, there definitely should be an option to do so.
b) I agree -- the Ribbon UI is less than ideal.
c) The interface definitely should be as flexible as possible.
d) Please read http://clickortap.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/the-citrus-menu/ :
I think it might answer some of your concerns.
I just read your second post on the subject. It seems more promising
than the first post. I am not a fan of black menus, which I find them
gorgeous, but harder to read. Maybe that's a problem with my
half-a-century old eyes.
Still, while the traditional menu system isn't perfect, I don't consider
it a disaster. Whether the traditional menu approach or a newer one is
used, we should make sure that we *improve* on the structure of menus
and on the user experience, whether it's for occasional users or power
users.
Right now, when I do word processing, compatibility issues often force
me to use Microsoft Office. But when I have the choice, I tend to prefer
Microsoft Office 2003 for short documents (it's easier to define pages,
styles, move illustrations...), but OpenOffice for anything above 20
pages (user-defined variables are easier to define and styles are easier
to define).
Regards,
--
Michel Gagnon
Montréal (Québec, Canada)
--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] UI proposal (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.