Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 29/09/2010 13:23, Joe Rotello wrote:

Suggestions for LibreOffice...most are general area ideas or
perceived needs.

NOT yet listed in any order of what might need to be done first,
second, etc.:

1. Libre users, both new Libre users or those coming over from
OpenOffice 3.2.x, NEED to know just where Libre is, compared to
OpenOffice 3.2.x...Is Libre built ON Ooo 3.2.x ? Is Libre branching
off from Ooo 3.2.x ? Does Libre have all the same functions
(separate applications) that

Alredy, we can see that Libre has a few features that are not seen
in Ooo 3.2.x, and that seems to be a good sign of Libre progress.

Unless Libre users, both new Libre users or those coming over from
OpenOffice 3.2.x, have an idea of just where Libre sits right now,
then likely confusing situations may develop, if not already.

Strongly seconded! Whilst it would be desirable for Oracle to join the club, it would be naive to expect them to and thus we will have a de facto fork. Some knowledge of the baseline and the development resources available to the Foundation would provide encouragement to current OO.o supporters and potential new users.

Peter HB

To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.