Hi Andre, everyone,
We use the same mechanism that is in place for years to build "flavours"
of OpenOffice.org. This worked for the last years and should be ok
now. If necessary, we will go and remove references to OpenOffice.org
(but we still hope, that Oracle joins us and we can use the brand that
we all have working for the last 10 years).
Yes, I realise this and I hope that this will also be the case, but I
was trying to ascertain what would be required if that didn't happen. It
seemed to me that one of the reasons that had accelerated (and perhaps I
am mistaken) the issue of creation of an independent foundation is the
slience that Oracle is currently displaying with regard to the community
as a whole and the vagueness of its publicly announced strategy (yes, I
did get to hear about the web service thing too).
Obviously, in marketing terms alone, it would be far better to have the
initial brand on board :-))
Alex
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.