[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- From: Erich Christian <erich_ooo@irq.at>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:04:38 +0200
- To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Hi,
Am 01.10.2010 20:31, schrieb Bernhard Dippold:
>> ""Oracle is investing substantial resources in OpenOffice.org. With more
>> than one hundred million users, we believe OpenOffice.org is the most
>> advanced, most feature rich open source implementation and will strongly
>> encourage the Open Office community to continue to contribute through
>> www.openoffice.org. However, the beauty of open source is that it can
>> be forked by anyone who chooses, as was done today. Our sincerest goal
>> for Open Office is that it become more widely used so if this new
>> foundation will help advance Open Office and the Open Document Format we
>> wish them the best.""
>>
>> In my opinion it means (at this very moment) that there will be
>> OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice as well.
> Not necessarily:
> They state:
> "Oracle is investing substantials resources in OpenOffice.org"
> I don't know if they mean the product (developers) or the community
> (infrastructure) in this point, but both is true and has ever been
> appreciated by the volunteer part of our community.
> But further down the line they talk about "Open Office" instead of
> "OpenOffice.org".
> If they did this on purpose (and I have to assume, that the "official
> statement" doesn't include such mistakes), so it has to be interpreted
> as referring to "Oracle Open Office" instead of "OpenOffice.org".
> So what is the "Open Office Community"?
> Reading the statement again, this might mean that the "OpenOffice.org
> Community" should "... encourage the Open Office Community (sic!) to
> continue to contribute through www.openoffice.org."
Bernhard thanks a lot for pointing this out!
(me too tried to drive attention on that on the german list)
> I always worked on improving and furthering OpenOffice.org - not for a
> company's but for our community's sake.
> I am not part of the "Open Office Community", but of the "OpenOffice.org
> Community".
> Even if I still hope for the trademark to be given back to us, this
> message is at least a sign in a dedicated direction. :-(
well said... ;-)
>> I don't think it is a problem, why not, if Oracle wants keep OO.o both
>> could developed. We will see if there is real contribution or not.
> They will develop Oracle Open Office - about OpenOffice.org's future
> there is nothing written in this statement.
guess why
>> And anyway the OOo name and rights owned by Oracle so we could do
>> nothing.
> We will not wait very long - too much to do and to decide.
Thanks again, "waiting for Godot" ;-)
cheers
Erich
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ? | Kürti László <kurti.laszlo@openskm.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ? | Bernhard Dippold <bernhard@familie-dippold.at> |
- Prev by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice build on
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- Index(es):
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.