[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- From: Charles Marcus <CMarcus@Media-Brokers.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:52:51 -0400
- To: email@example.com
On 2010-10-01 3:12 PM, Jon Hamkins wrote:
> The statement from Oracle implies they are keeping the trademark, so I
> think we are beyond hope on that point -- they are wishing us farewell
> and good luck on our fork, not rejoining us.
> There is one helpful thing about their comment, which is that it came
> quickly and we can now all settle on LibreOffice as the longterm name --
> it will be an actual fork, not a temporary name that may revert back to
One thing I would like to see the Document Foundation undertake is to
(or at least try to) organize the other major efforts, like Go-oo,
OxygenOffice and NeoOffice - and maybe now even IBM/Lotus Symphony - to
eliminate duplication of effort and coordinate patch acceptance, etc.
The inclusion of most of go-oo's more stable patches in the first beta
release is an excellent first step in this direction, and I hope is only
'shades of things to come' in this area.
I'm getting really excited at the possibilities!
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Marc Paré <email@example.com>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Sophie <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Kürti László <email@example.com>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Bernhard Dippold <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Jon Hamkins <email@example.com>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOfficeForum.org is now functioning
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?