[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- From: Cor Nouws <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 23:27:33 +0200
- To: email@example.com
Sophie wrote (01-10-10 23:11)
Charles Marcus wrote:
One thing I would like to see the Document Foundation undertake is to
(or at least try to) organize the other major efforts, like Go-oo,
OxygenOffice and NeoOffice - and maybe now even IBM/Lotus Symphony - to
eliminate duplication of effort and coordinate patch acceptance, etc.
This is I think what we would like to offer, may be not only one brand
but a home for each flavour. This is why we moved to no CA/JCA/SCA and
stayed with the LGPLv3.
Well said Sophie. It is one of the main goals of the foundation: a place where the mutual interest of all people and companies around OpenOffice.org can really come to a impressive multiplier effect.
That is what open source is about (too) and that we like to see happen more and more.
>> free OpenOffice.org : LibreOffice <<
- giving openoffice.org its foundation? The Document Foundation -
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Kürti László <email@example.com>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Bernhard Dippold <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Jon Hamkins <email@example.com>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Charles Marcus <CMarcus@Media-Brokers.com>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?||Sophie <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
- Prev by Date: [tdf-discuss] [MAILING LIST] interim structuring - a proposal
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] [OT] Interview on LibreOffice
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?