Joel Madero schrieb:
I am adding Rainer to this as I think he has some points about mingw -
Hi Joel,
unfortunately I have no knowledge at all. The only reason for my MinGW
activity was that for a long time MinGW tinderbox build much more
reliably that the others so that it often was my only source for Master
builds. But unfortunately the results always only were usable for some
tests, but never for real use. And currently MingW builds are broken. So
thinking about alternatives is appreciated.
But of course, there might be some strategig thoughts I don't know?
As far as I know Eilidh McAdam had some activity with MinGW, and also
Michael Meeks, but that knowledge is very old (March 2012). May be you
should ask them or at an ESC call concerning the current strategy.
Best regards
Rainer
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.