Re: [tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences

You need a degree in licensing to really know all the ins ands outs of 
what is the differences between them.  That said, it still is all about 
what the developer feels is a better license for their coding.  What I 
have heard from people is that they would prefer to provide the coding 
under one type of licensing over another.  If they do not like the 
"default" licensing for a project, they may be less likely to contribute 
their coding to that project.

The question, as I have heard, is if you provide coding to the LO 
project and AOO takes that coding - can they then relicense it under a 
more restrictive license that is not what the developer wanted?  Can 
software companies take open source coding under a licensing that still 
gives the developer ownership, but then relicense it under some other 
version that then becomes part of that company's software "ownership" 
and no longer available for an open source project?

On 12/31/2012 08:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> That is completely incorrect, no matter how many folks keep saying it.
>
> Put simply: using the LibreOffice or Apache OpenOffice distributions does not raise any practical 
> limitations on most personal use as well as use by individuals in their business or institutional 
> activities.
>
>   - Dennis
>
> PS: The preferred terms is ALv2 (ASL is something else), or simply Apache License.
>
> DETAILS
>
> Committers to Apache projects retain all rights, while granting the ASF a perpetual license to 
> distribute under ASF-chosen license terms.  There is no transfer of ownership whatsoever.  (Just 
> for a moment of irony, it was the case that Sun and then Oracle did require a [non-exclusive] 
> transfer of ownership, as does the Free Software Foundation to this day.)
>
> You can find the ALv2 everywhere.  The Committer License Agreement (CLA) is here:
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>.
>
> The key statement is this:
>
>     "Except for the license granted herein to the Foundation
>      and recipients of software distributed by the Foundation,
>      You reserve all right, title, and interest in and to
>      Your Contributions."
>
> Note that people who simply make use of the ALv2 and distribute their own (and derivative) work 
> under the ALv2 don't have to make any such grant.  It is contributors to ASF-sponsored projects 
> that do this.
>
> This is not much difference to the e-mail grants of license that LibreOffice committers make to the 
> TDF, except those grants name specific licenses (and say nothing about patents).
>
> The fundamental technical difference is that the Apache ALv2 license is not a reciprocal license.  
> It does not require that derivative works be provided in source code and under the same license.  
> The ALv2 also has no limitations on the use of a distribution or its derivative in an embedded 
> system or inside of a [commercial] distributed service.
>
> The license differences have no practical impact on end users.  It does have ideological importance 
> to contributors.  Some end users may want to express their allegiance to one model or the other. In 
> cultivating such allegiance, it is valuable to stick to the facts.
>
>   - Dennis
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P [mailto:webmaster@krackedpress.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 12:19
> To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences
>
> [ ... ]
> As I was told, LO's license will allow the developer to own the coding
> they are sharing with the project, where AOO's really will give that
> project the ownership of the coding.  Whether or not the "wording" is
> stating that, that is what most developers I have "talked" with have
> told me.
>
> [ ... ]


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted