hi Pedro, all,
Pedro wrote (17-05-12 12:28)
IMHO after several releases it is possibly time to slow down a bit and
concentrate on Quality instead of Quantity...
A suggested contradiction between quality and new functions is an
artificial (which has been explained over and again ;-) and has been the
case ever since OpenOffice.org 1.0.1, and will be the case too in other
projects based on the old OpenOffice.org code, once things start to
happen there..)
Apart from that: people concerned in improving quality, for which there
always is place, make sure they contribute to QA and e.g. use the QA
mailing list.
One of the most important items is helping that problems that are found/
reported, are clearly visible in true context, so that nasty regressions
are marked and recognised as such, thus that developers can jump on them
asap :-)
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice priorities (continued)
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice priorities · Cor Nouws
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.