Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [tdf-discuss] Is Microsoft getting worried about free Office suites?


It is very difficult for libreoffice to be cloud based. Libreoffice is
doing the right thing with fixing bugs. But they need to stick with one
code base in the cloud. Such as html5 or java. I would use html5.
Libreoffice writer desktop suite is really good because it is fast. Speed
is a priority for people wanting to get work done. It needs to be
incorporated in all the apps including the start up of libreoffice. It is
fast but it must be the fastest. Clear and simple to getting a document
spreadsheet power point created. That is the problem that I find in
Microsoft office it freezes sometimes and the ribbon makes dialogue boxes
complicated not simple for power users and more random errors. Libreoffice
must create a cloud based app. The key for libreoffice and most likely for
apple and especially Microsoft is updated fixes and maintenance and lastly
releases.  It is something that libreoffice does and communicates well with
the use of schedules and wikis. The cloud will need to have constant
support and maintenance and releases for it to work effectively with users
and their different desktop environments. It is a lot of hard work. But if
it worked libreoffice would defanitely not go under or in strife like
Internet explorer on Mac or openoffice. At the end of the day. There is a
way to bridge the cloud and the desktop. Some people do not like working in
the cloud because of security. Some people like to work on the cloud
because of collaboration. If libreoffice could incorporate both, it would
be something that google apple and Microsoft would need to think about.
Lj.

On Tuesday, 29 November 2011, Ian Lynch <ianrlynch@gmail.com> wrote:
On 29 November 2011 10:39, lj <ljeloudev@gmail.com> wrote:

 Libreoffice has one thing. It's for free. You can't beat
that price. Consumers will use a product like google docs because it's
free
and easy to use.


Yes, people expect to get stuff like this for free from the internet so it
is difficult for MS or Apple to charge extra for office software in this
environment and if they offer it for free they run the risk of killing
their own cash cows on the desktop.


It's the exact same for libreoffice they just need mobile
and cloud adoption and a little more advertisement in marketing to stay
in
the game.


Cloud is one area where features do tend to be light so a cloud based LibO
would be a killer app, especially if there was a compact version that
could
run on a cell phone, locally. But the big problem is that this is a
massive
amount of work and by the time it is done, it might well be too late.




Lj.
On Tuesday, 29 November 2011, Ian Lynch <ianrlynch@gmail.com> wrote:
On 28 November 2011 20:16, Robert Derman <robert.derman@pressenter.com
wrote:

Olav Dahlum wrote:

On 28/11/11 13:13, Pedro wrote:


Ian Lynch wrote


Google should do a version of Office based on the
OOo/LibO code base and embed ads and search links, make it
available
freely
and brand it Google Office.  Given their brand strength and
marketing,
that
would probably do more to frighten MS than anything we can do.
Slightly
surprised they haven't already done it.



Interesting concept. But I think they are investing a lot on the
"Cloud"
with the Chrome Book laptops that investing time on an offline suite
doesn't
make much sense...

In the same line of thought: Google Docs is fine in the "Developed"
countries where working in the "Cloud" is a reality. This is not so
for
more
than 2/3 of the world's population
(http://www.**internetworldstats.com/stats.**htm<
http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm>
)

I do believe that currently LibreOffice is the leading alternative
to
MS
Office (but would love to see some numbers :) )


Just a couple of observations here.  First, most businesses do not
and
probably will not in the near future,  go to cloud computing.


I sort of hope not, gives us competitive advantage but realistically,
most
businesses are SMEs employing less than 10 people so I should think
"most"
will migrate at least to partial use of cloud services. Like us, it
doesn't
have to be all one thing or another.

 there are several reasons for this, foremost, security.


If cloud security was an insurmountable problem, I doubt we would have
on-line banking.


 Companies do not want important documents with proprietary
information
flying back and forth on the internet where they could be intercepted.


That misunderstands Cloud. We have content types that are secure to the
people that need to see them. Some pages on the web site can only be
viewed
by people with certain permissions - eg the qualifications regulators
and
us. If there is something that is really, really top secret we can
make a
special arrangement for it but sending as an e-mail attachment is
probably
worse security. In fact, Cloud enables us to authenticate certificates
directly on-line without a charge so it increases security in our most
important business activity. If we change our policies and procedures,
the
regulators get them immediately, we don't have to remember to send them
an
updated file and they don't have to have a management system for
different
file versions.


Second, reliability.  Remote servers and the infrastructure between
local
computers and them have been known to go down.  Most companies don't
want
to have to rely on vulnerable remote connections.


We all have 3G mobile phones here. In the rare occasion of an outage,
we
can still access all our files via wireless. Ok, its a bit slower but
its
certainly good enough. It also means I can access everything when
abroad.
Its a bit like saying relying on electricity is relying on vulnerable
remote connections. If its critical you have back up batteries or a
generator, if it isn't you live with the odd power cut because overall
the
benefits outweigh that.


Another thing, most companies would like to own the resources that
they
depend on for day to day operation.


We own all our resources. Cloud does not mean you have to give up
ownership
of your resources, it means you are buying a hosting service.

I hear a lot of people talking about how tablets are taking over, but
somehow I just don't see a corporate steno pool using tablets or
smartphones to produce their important documents.


I don't see corporate steno pools at all. We all do our own admin
because
its quicker and more efficient than hiring typists. Personally I don't
use
a tablet but then maybe I'm just a bit set in my keyboard ways. I/o
devices
is a whole different issue, but cloud enables you to choose any that
suits
you irrespective of the OS, hardware or local apps.


 Desktop (tower case) computers will continue to dominate all serious
corporate computing applications.  That means MS Office or suitable
substitutes will continue to be the most important applications in the
business world.


Actually laptops are already taking over. Once Android starts
saturating
mobile devices that massively out number conventional computers now, I
can
see it moving up and displacing most of the existing Windows desktops.
So
for Linux domination, its most likely to come via Android. But that
will
take time - after all some people still use typewriters. I'd be
surprised
though that if in 5 years we don't see some radical changes in dominant
apps. Look at web browsers who would have guessed IE would be down
around
50% of the market 5 years ago?

The biggest reason, as far as I can see it that MS Office will continue
to
dominate is not because of file format tie up, at least not from 2014
on,
but because of quality shortcomings in all competing products.


More simply habit and brand strength. Coca Cola dominates mainly on the
brand strength. How hard is it to make something tasting like CC? Not
that
hard. Marketing it and branding it is the difficult bit. That is why
the
best thing that could happen to OOo/LibO would be adoption of the Code
Base
by Google. Look what Apple did for getting users for the BSD code base.

 Face it, LibreOffice Writer doesn't have anywhere  near as good a
spell
check function as Word does.


Which probably makes a difference to less than 1% of the users. It's
not
about technical details, its about marketing. If it was all about
technology, DOS would never have got off the ground in the first place.
It
was simply the adoption by IBM.

Writer's spell check dictionary is woefully short of compound words.
 Writer doesn't have a good grammar checker function built in.  Also
Writer
is very much lacking in templates and clip art compared to Word.  Now
home
users and students might well overlook these shortcomings because of
the
rather large difference in the cost to obtain the software, but
businesses,
never.  Now these things can be fixed, and many of them won't even
require
a lot of effort from our developers.  Many of us users who may have
added
thousands of words to our spell check dictionaries could contribute
them
to
the project if some developers showed us how.  Also, the auto correct
function as it currently exists can be turned into a fairly good
grammar
correcter  by simply adding a lot of functions to it using its current
customization capabilities.  I have made mine able to automatically
capitalize all the days of the week, all months except March and May,
since
these two also exist as other words.  The program can be trained to
capitalize most proper nouns, to correct most common typos, etc.
 With a
little more effort in such areas we can bring Writer much closer to
the
basic quality of Word.


Even if you achieve that why change for something that is simply as
good
in
a feature that will bother few people?

I never use spreadsheets, so I really can't comment on any shortcomings
of
Calc.


Main shortcoming for me is that I need to share sheets with colleagues
all
over the world and for that Google Docs knocks the spots off Excel and
Calc. I don't care if some obscure functions I'll never use are not
there.
I need to share straightforward data efficiently and that applies to
probably 90% of the population.


 But I do know that a word processor is the core of any office suite.


I find we put more an more direct to web pages. Most of that
information
will never be printed. What is really needed is better web page
editors.
Since I can produce pdfs directly from my web pages why would I worry
about
print layout, especially for most documents that are better kept
simple.
There is massive misuse of Word Processor documents (eg for data
collection) mainly because of the workflows people are used to. That
will
take time to change but it is a human thing not a technological one so
cramming more features and refinements into "old" technologies is going
to
have a limited life time.

 If some of the developers will help me and a few other users who might
volunteer to help with some of these things, that don't actually
require
the specific skills of a programmer/developer, I think that we could
do
a
lot to make LibreOffice a much better office suite, in particular much
better than OOo was at the point of the fork.


A competition between LibO and OOo for features is entirely missing the
point. It will be a waste of resources and achieve very little. A
competition for making the code faster, more efficient and suitable for
mobile technologies would be a much better strategy given industry
trends.
It might already be too late but every day delayed is a day nearer to
missing the boat entirely.

I know that the developers have done much to improve the code base,
but I
am sure that some of us non developers could also help to improve the
useability of the suite.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@**
documentfoundation.org
<discuss%2Bhelp@documentfoundation.org>
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
unsubscribe/<
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/>
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
Netiquette <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>
List archive: http://listarchives.**
documentfoundation.org/www/**discuss/
<http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/>
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


--
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and
Wales.

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



--
Laurence Jeloudev
Do us a favour and get gmail (http://www.gmail.com), so you don't loose
your emails and then print them off!

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted




--
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and
Wales.

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



-- 
Laurence Jeloudev
Do us a favour and get gmail (http://www.gmail.com), so you don't loose
your emails and then print them off!

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.