Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hallo :-)

Am 23.11.2011 23:45, schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:

After getting reports about serious issues hindering efficient mail
communication through the recent practiced "reply-to mangling" on our
mailing lists, we from tech team are going for a test setup, switching
it off for one - most likely this one.
We expect to grow our wisdom about the upcoming effects. :o))

There sure will be effects. But it is not sure, that we will
recognize the effects here on the list.

I am subscribed to some mailing lists, that do not modify the
reply-to header. Communication on these lists usually looks like this:

* user@domain.tld sends a question to mailinglist@community.org

* Other subscribers send their reply to user@domain.tld.

* On the list, it looks like if there were no answers at all.

* The poster of the question does get some answers, but does not
realize, that she is the only one, who received them.

When you do this test, how will you find out, how often someone sent
an answer to the user accidentally, instead of sending it to the list?

:-)

Stefan

-- 
LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir!

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.