Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index



carlo.strata wrote:

Hi Pedro and Tor,

What do you think about that?


I think that LibreOffice should use an Open Source compiler.

I also think that most of the LibreOffice Devs don't use the Office programs
they are developing on a daily basis as a production tool. If they did, it
would be obvious to them that an x64 build is needed to work on heavy
documents.

In any case this is just my personal opinion.

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Will-win64-native-build-exist-on-3-5-0-or-at-least-3-5-x-releases-tp3473463p3478780.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.