Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Italo Vignoli wrote (02-10-11 22:20)
On 10/02/2011 08:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:

2. I have an offer. What formatting by senders will most powerfully
serve those on [libreoffice-accessibility]? What do those with access
limitations confirm to be the best that works for all of them?
Whatever *that* is, I will do everything in my power to honor.

I am not an expert about accessibility, but I recall that this is one of
the cases where top posting is the best choice. I suggest to have a
double check, though, as I am not competent in this domain.

I just checked with Peter op 't Hof, Dutch accessibility expert.
He says there is no accessibility problem with mail handling. Most important is that it's ascii. (I did not ask if the people that rely on special handling for accessibility, have to do some extra tolling or settings. But I imagine the people are informed well enough themselves.)

So accessibility can't be considered as a reason for different mail handling.


 - Cor

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.