Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


My apologies for the heavy-duty cross-posting.  It might be good to pick a single public list and a 
subject header and converge there.

Q: WHERE IS THE PROPOSAL?

This started as a simple e-mail list question by Jaime R. Garza on the [tdf-discuss] list:
<http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg07698.html>.

There is no proposal in the sense of some technical submission to adapt ODF for this purpose.  You 
are pretty much seeing the extent of the discussion so far.  The proposal is a paragraph and 
concept being echoed around these lists now.

Q: WHERE TO BECOME INVOLVED IN ODF IN HTML5?

There are probably two ways to be involved. 

First, development of a proof-of-concept and working [reference] implementation is valuable.

Secondly, the development of necessary specifications, perhaps jointly between the OASIS ODF TC and 
the W3C, might be required.  

Also, one needs to differentiate between making some sort of OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice deliverable 
that works in HTML5 and a worked extension of HTML5 that somehow ties into the ODF Format.  

It might not even make technical sense to "make ODF part of HTML5," and that has to be resolved 
also.

Q: WHAT ABOUT OASIS (and what does Rob Weir have to say about this)?

Rob is on vacation this week.  I know he and others involved on the OASIS TCs are interested in 
this topic.

A related topic (defining HTML5 presentation of ODF documents) was raised at the OASIS ODF 
Interoperability and Conformance (OIC TC) on their 2011-09-07 teleconference call:
<http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oic/201109/msg00009.html>.  It came under section 3.2.3 
Profiles.  The discussion is of a Web Profile for ODF.  That is not an insignificant effort.

Q: WHAT ARE THE TECHNICAL CHALLENGES?

   ODF has no rendering model and certainly not an interactive-presentation/-editing model.  None.  
Obviously, OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice do, but those is not to be found in the ODF specification.

There are an insignificant number of [X]HTML-isms in the ODF specifications.  XLINK is used, for 
example.

There is no specified mapping to [X]HTML.  If there were, the import/export of [X]HTML in various 
implementations of ODF-bases software would presumable work better.  That would be the potential 
subject matter of a Web Profile though.

There is no standardized ODF DOM (and API) nor a mapping of ODF into an HTML[5] DOM.  Somehow, to 
make macros and applets work inside ODF, something like this is required as well, although having 
it fit HTML5 as well might be a confusion of abstraction levels.  (The integration of macros and 
applets that access the interior structure and external presentation of an ODF document is 
implementation-defined in ODF 1.2.)

Q: WHERE CAN TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT HAPPEN?

The ODF Toolkit project offers some DOM implementations, but they are not part of ODF itself.  

The ODF Toolkit project is currently being moved to Apache though.  That project is currently quite 
Java-centric.  It might be interesting to include that effort in this conversation, however.

If a public reference implementation were to be developed, I believe it is desirable to have it be 
Apache licensed, wherever development were to occur.  The possibility of a new podling at Apache 
specifically for this effort should not be overlooked.  

That is the only political part that I see to these challenges, apart from developers, including in 
private projects, wanting to do it themselves. 



-----Original Message-----
From: Jaime R. Garza [mailto:garzaj@gmail.com] 
<http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg07708.html>
< 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201110.mbox/%3cCAJGN0paeBoKS7HTqpc0waW_qRJgcxEZr-rk+63MMBuBsCe-Xxg@mail.gmail.com%3e>

Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 03:29
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] ODF and HTML 5

Do you have any contacts, links, infos about the proposal and status? I
would really like to get involved!

I think the first step is to integrate ODF into HTML5 as read only, editing
could come later. But this is more political than technical.

Cheers!

Jaime

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:07, Ian Lynch <ianrlynch@gmail.com> wrote:
< http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg07705.html>
< 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201110.mbox/%3cCAOap24+y0rFCOA78YFHTLMURQ5LO4OJ7aaLyi3HP0rtFm-2EOw@mail.gmail.com%3e>

There has been a proposal to try and get ODF recognised as an official
extension of HTML5. On the face of it it sounds a good idea but I
don't know enough about the details or whether this is already in
progress. I guess it would require discussion with W3C, OASIS, and
probably TDF and ASF as a minimum. A logical technical need could be
to develop ODF rendering and editing in web browsers. To start with
this might simply be a limited subset of what can be achieved in
OO/LibO.
--
Ian
[ ... ]


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.