Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Cor Nouws wrote:

So now you skip the stupid wrong initial reasoning you made in your 
previous post and start with another idea that to me just looks as the 
next poisonous attempt to do as if developers are incompetent 
uninterested people?

I just rewrote what I meant since the previous post wasn't clear.

I'm sorry if that is what you understand from my words. I never said they
are incompetent (that would be absurd) nor uninterested (otherwise they
wouldn't be spending their time on this project).

Cor Nouws wrote:

You simply seem not interested in understanding what is going on, nor do 
not show that you know what you talk about. Then to me it looks better 
if you stick with your decision from a month or so ago, and just leave 
the mail lists, as you wrote me.
Really, postings like those add nothing positive or constructive. While 
there is enough to do.

I did leave the mailing lists but subscribed again to this particular one. 
I think that even non-programmers can contribute to this project.

My point here is that for a dev, a bug is a bug. For a user a particular bug
that stops him from being able to work on a document is particularly
serious. Releasing version 3.4.2 as enterprise ready when such bugs can be
introduced by a regression (and remain) doesn't make much sense. I would say
version 3.3.x IS enterprise ready.

This is a warning that problems like this are occurring and need to be
better triaged. That is my opinion.

As you see there was a constructive message in my post. In any case negative
input is also important, it shows where people are unhappy and could be a
pointer to something that needs to be fixed. It is no reason to tell people
to go away.

View this message in context:
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.