Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

[tdf-discuss] Re: Viability of the 3.4.2 Release



Cor Nouws wrote:

Glad to read that, because indeed, your reasoning above is completely
illogical :-D


Since regressions that occurred between 3.3.x and 3.4.x were not "simply
reverted" and that only regressions between  3.4.x releases are fixed at
this stage, what are the chances that previous regressions are going to be
considered?

E.g. I know it doesn't really matter to the devs that a user can no longer
load a docx document which contains an OLE object because docx is from the
evil MS. Shame on the user for using OOXML. Just go back to 3.3.x or use
ODF, right?

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Viability-of-the-3-4-2-Release-tp3215651p3229984.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.