Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Viability of the 3.4.2 Release

plino wrote (06-08-11 00:24)
> Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Glad to read that, because indeed, your reasoning above is completely
> > illogical :-D
>
> Since regressions that occurred between 3.3.x and 3.4.x were not "simply
> reverted" and that only regressions between  3.4.x releases are fixed at
> this stage, what are the chances that previous regressions are going to be
> considered?

So now you skip the stupid wrong initial reasoning you made in your 
previous post and start with another idea that to me just looks as the 
next poisonous attempt to do as if developers are incompetent 
uninterested people?

> E.g. I know it doesn't really matter to the devs that a user can no longer
> load a docx document which contains an OLE object because docx is from the
> evil MS. Shame on the user for using OOXML. Just go back to 3.3.x or use
> ODF, right?

It is said nowhere, and proven wrong too by the facts, that regressions 
from 3.3.x to 3.4.x are not fixed.
You simply seem not interested in understanding what is going on, nor do 
not show that you know what you talk about. Then to me it looks better 
if you stick with your decision from a month or so ago, and just leave 
the mail lists, as you wrote me.
Really, postings like those add nothing positive or constructive. While 
there is enough to do.


--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted