Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

This topic has revealed the following personal observations.

People seem to want LO to be an exact clone of m$ where they can
perform the same m$ tasks, produce the same m$ output, without paying
m$. They happen to have a convenient choice in another product (LO)
that perhaps is more attractive/intuitive to use, ideally producing m$
output so perfect that the recipient would be aware that LO was used.
For such people, there is no interest in promoting or improving odf;
their priority is to continue producing m$ format output to the
detriment of odf. Having read the comments of those who wish LO to be
a m$ clone (including the LO statement about m$ooxml), there is little
evidence that the ability to create m$ format documents will _in any
way_ lead to the increased quantity of odf documents; instead, there
will be an increase in m$ format documents that have been created by
LO. The result? Continued dominance of m$. Make no mistake, every LO
user who saves a document in an m$ format instead of odf, is not
promoting the odf at all, but killing it insiduously; new (probably
entirely m$ OS) users are being enticed with this concept of "m$
output without the m$ price" when the bigger picture is odf to become
the future default format.

The ability to import m$ formats and produce only native odf documents
would be a good idea. Users would have a clear choice to make; either
promote odf, or decide it is more important to produce m$ documents
and therefore such people should simply buy m$. Of course, opponents
of odf don't want to pay and therefore promote the "m$ is essential to
me" viewpoint. Either pay m$, or donate the equivalent to LO to
produce superior odf documents.

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.