Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Disagree.

If we dont support ms file formats, the users will keep bying ms office. If
we support ms formats users who are willing to shift will be abole to shift.

Today one of the most important stopperts is problems with legacy documents
and exchange of documents with external parties.

First we must teach users that non-editable docs should be exchqnged as pdf.
But it will take time.

By supporting ms files er will encourage users to Use odf.

Please note that im not saying anythng about OOXML but only about the
document formats that actually exits out there: docx, xlsx, pptx etc.

I agree with anyone saying er should not support ooxml. Never.

Cheers all
Leif
The Danish team

Den 28/07/2011 22.40 skrev "Jomar Silva" <homembit@gmail.com>:
I'm following this thread since the last week and I believe that this
is an extremely important discussion for us all.

I support the initial idea of concentrating our work force on better
ODF support and functionality improvements in LO, but I also
understand the need that people have to use LO to manipulate MSO
documents.

To be honest, the far we keep 'good' MSO support on LO, the more we
are contributing to maintain the status quo of MS formats, so I'm not
proposing to stop it right now, but to start thinking about a date to
do so (i.e. we'll keep the support until the end of 2012, and after
that, we will not maintain that development... what's done is done,
but we'll not put efforts on improving it after that date).

This proposal is almost aligned with what Microsoft did with their ODF
implementation (the "Implementation Notes" that Dennis is always
talking about, where they simply stated "we will not support that" and
period), and also aligned with the way we do things at standards
development (we mark something as deprecated on one version, keep that
as deprecated on the next one and on a version later on, when almost
nobody is using that feature, we simply remove that from the spec).

In summary: It's good to users that we support MSO files, but the real
world side effect of that is that people will keep using MSO files...
it's up to us to find a way to change the Status Quo in a smooth way
:)

My 2 cents,

Jomar

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.