On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 15:08 -0300, Jomar Silva wrote:
There is some discussion going on at the Apache OOo mail list
regarding the place to host extensions
It seems that the current hosting of extensions is facing some
problems, and it will be great if we find a new (and common) home for
the extensions, in a way that both Apache OOo and LibreOffice could
use as a shared extensions repository.
hmmm - that is assuming that the two separate projects will maintain
enough common code base that shared extensions are possible - that is a
requirement that I for one would not want to see enforced. The fact that
we can share extensions today is, IMO, a remnant of a past history and
should not dictate decisions for going forward - so I would not be in
favor our hosting Apache OpenOffice.org branded extensions on a
TDF/LibreOffice service, nor would I be in favor or seeing
TDF/Libreoffice continue to point back to Apache OpenOffice.org for any
future end user services.
One related item here - Templates I think are a totally different
consideration. I can see the ability to share templates between all of
the ODF capable applications as a reasonable goal, a very desirable
It is extensions that I am concerned with here - to put it simply, I do
not consider LibreOffice a downstream product of OpenOffice.org code any
longer as with this next release if I understand correctly there will be
no merge of OO.o code, nor can I see how Apache OpenOffice can ever be a
down stream of LibreOffice.
Nor am not saying that the two separate projects must diverge for
divergence sake, only that having a shared service would add resistance
to diverging and that is something that I would strongly disagree with -
our options are open as of today and I would prefer to see them stay
I understand that many people still hope that OO.o and LibreOffice will
somehow blend back into a single project - I can only say that I am not
one of those people.
This idea that there is some finite set of resources is one I take
exception with. In my best judgment the resources assembled here under
TDF/LibreOffice are sufficient to take this project and product
I wish the folks forming up under Apache to resurrect the OpenOffice.org
project all the best of luck on the project they have decided to
undertake, but I truly believe that their actions should bear very
little weight with the people working here when it comes to
planing/building out our offerings to end users.
We could also do the same to host templates.
Any thoughts about that ?
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy