Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:37, Simon Phipps <> wrote:
And right there you have both reached a point so familiar that even I have written an article 
about it:
"The fact it is still an open question after nearly 30 years of free and open source software 
experience suggests both outlooks have merits, and we’ll not resolve the question here!"

Nah. I was responding to the "removes rights" comment. Not "which
approach best improves the commons". I don't have much of an opinion
there because I agree with your article: both approaches improve the
commons, and it is very hard to determine which is "better". So I just
avoid relative value judgements on either approach w.r.t. commons.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.