On 6/7/11 3:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I agree... My "going over it" was simply to indicate areas which
I *think* (again, I have no idea, nor do a *want* to know) may
have been reasons Oracle declined, since that seems a point
that people are extremely curious about.
Provided that they received the letter and they never replied I think
it is reasonable to state that they never considered it, because of
corporate reasons we will never know.
Between "humans", before declining you usually investigate further and
then provide a reason for declining. Otherwise, it looks like you are
just ignoring (which is fine).
Corporations are just not as educated as humans, and therefore do not
feel they should behave following the basics of mutual respect. This
is the reason why I have decided to abandon a corporate career.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.