Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


2011/5/13 plino <>:

This isn't even about OpenOffice vs LibreOffice... It's about Closed Source
vs Open Source

TBH I think it was a bad move to change radically if you have experienced
and productive users trained on whatever program (regardless of the

Also, if you need professional support you can't just move to Open Source,
let alone a Linux distro that was still being developed...

Could it be that it took them 6 years to realize that?

There were much articles about this in the german press these days and
the government has to answer some questions which had been asked from
the opposition in parliament.
The main problem was that the OpenSource strategy was half-hearted as
the end-user had to work with dual-boot systems, some applications on
Windows, some on Linux. Also the guidance was poor and the apps did
not get updated for years. So the endusers in the diplomatic services
got displeased more and more, but the responsible persons in the
administration choose the wrong way out.
This is the short version, you can read a bit more at the H :



++ Volker Merschmann - Member of The Document Foundation -

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.