Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Question about proposing the creation of a new format

> My take on this suggestion is that LibO does what it does well.  Production
> of epub documents is a marginal requirement


I'm sure that is what MSFT thought about Windows in relation to cell phones
and tablets ;-)

, which does not need to be addressed with a built-in function.
>  Professionals won't use it, and non-professionals are adequately served by
> the extension I mentioned - I believe there are now several btw.

So the bottom line is that I vote against incorporating epub production into
LibO Writer.Just my 2c

I don't think that was a specific proposal at this point, just that the
entire LO proposition could become marginalised by mobile technologies and
e-publishing in a relatively short space of time.


> //James
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted



-- 
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications
The Schools ITQ

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted