Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Support for Office 2003 file formats (WordML, SpreadsheetML

On 2011-03-29 14:25, Michel Gagnon wrote:
> Le 2011-03-28 15:29, aqualung a écrit :
> > Jaime R. Garza wrote:
> > > In my opinion Must, Should, Could, Completely Irrelevant:
> > >
> > > - *Must*: RTF
> > > - *Must*: MS Office 97/2000/XP Binary
> > > - *Completely Irrelevant*: MS Office 2003 XML
> > > - *Should*: OOXML ECMA-376 / ISO/IEC 29500 Transitional
> > > - *Must*: OOXML  ISO/IEC 29500 Strict
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > >
> > > Jaime
> > Which one of the above is the .docx file extension produced by MS Office
> > 2007 and 2010? That one is the most important of all IMHO.
>
> I also agree that Ms Office 2010 format is coming more and more common
> and should be a *MUST*.
> On the other hand, RTF seems so bastard that basic support is probably
> ok.
Should the list be broken into READ WRITE.
It might be that a condition exists such as *must* READ MS Office 2003
XML, *Completely Irrelevant*: WRITE MS Office 2003 XML.


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***