On 2011-03-29 14:25, Michel Gagnon wrote:
Le 2011-03-28 15:29, aqualung a écrit :
Jaime R. Garza wrote:
In my opinion Must, Should, Could, Completely Irrelevant:
- *Must*: RTF
- *Must*: MS Office 97/2000/XP Binary
- *Completely Irrelevant*: MS Office 2003 XML
- *Should*: OOXML ECMA-376 / ISO/IEC 29500 Transitional
- *Must*: OOXML ISO/IEC 29500 Strict
Which one of the above is the .docx file extension produced by MS Office
2007 and 2010? That one is the most important of all IMHO.
I also agree that Ms Office 2010 format is coming more and more common
and should be a *MUST*.
On the other hand, RTF seems so bastard that basic support is probably
Should the list be broken into READ WRITE.
It might be that a condition exists such as *must* READ MS Office 2003
XML, *Completely Irrelevant*: WRITE MS Office 2003 XML.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Support for Office 2003 file formats (WordML, SpreadsheetML (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy