Why not license it under an appropriate license that would allow us to
put it in the app store? would that mean we would need to remove the GPL
or can it be dual licensed to go on the app store?
On 01/08/2011 01:46 PM, Charles.h.Schulz wrote:
Ben,
To be frank I would be very tempted by the Mac App Store. We would gain a lot of traction and
perhaps revenue. I read the links you provided with attention but what I can gather is somewhat
controversial or at least would require some sort of legal workaround. Let me explain what I see:
- FSF thinks the Mac App Store policies are in contraddiction with the GPL and points to specific
clauses in it.
- the neat and clean way to do this is to relicense the software completely. We cannot do this -one
of the reasons is that we don't want a copyright assignment- but even if we had one we would still
be hindered by the Oracle copyright in it.
Last but not least, at this Westnoth is in conflict with the FSF. I usually consider myself a free
and independent thinking person but I also know that the FSF is our friend. We talk to them. Why
making ennemies?
Just my 2 euro cents,
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Mac App Store (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.