On 1/3/11 8:03 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
So pointing out the Novell/Microsoft marketing agreement that led to the
inclusion of writing to OOXML would not be a positive contribution?
I will repeat the concept for the last time, as it looks like you have
real problem in understanding it. It might be because my English is far
from perfect, but it looks like you do not understand even if there are
English native speakers telling the same thing.
We all know the Novell/Microsoft agreement. Only a small percentage of
TDF founders is involved with Novell and most of the others - including
me - are active opponents of OOXML as a document format. I speak at
conferences to explain the disadvantages of using OOXML, I write about
it, I am featured in the press.
During the standardization process of OOXML, I have participated in
standards committees in order to try to stop the process or to make the
standard a better one. Charles Schulz has done the same in France. We
all know the story.
So long for the concept.
TDF was born as a software project to serve the user. Therefore, the
right attitute for a positive contribution would have been the opposite
from yours: i.e. not writing OOXML would be an advantage for the user,
Unfortunately, the thread was started on the basis that writing OOXML
was equal to supporting Microsoft, and that LibreOffice should not
As I have told several times, a negative attitude against anyone - being
an infividual, an entity, a government body, or a corporation - is not
considered a positive contribution.
I hope it is clear now, I will not write it again.
Which version of OOXML does LibreOffice write to? The official standard
approved version? Or one of the proprietary Microsoft versions? Which
one? Or are these not positive inquiries?
Charles has explained that LibreOffice writes OOXML transitional, i.e.
the format supported by MS Office today.
How about commenting on the articles criticizing OOXML? Oh right, that
is not positive either. Besides it contravenes the Novell/Microsoft
I have written articles, spoken at conferences, provided statements
criticizing OOXML. I have never seen something similart from you.
Any comment on the Novell/Microsoft marketing agreement and how it
affects the development of LibreOffice? Or would that not be positive
If you have a personal agenda against Microsoft, there are many places
where your agenda is going to be considered a positive one. Here we do
not share this AGAINST concept, and we consider any personal agenda
AGAINST someone as useless and extremely negative for TDF.
Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation
Mobile +39.348.5653829 - VoIP: +39.02.320621813
Skype: italovignoli - GTalk: firstname.lastname@example.org
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format · Larry Gusaas
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format · Italo Vignoli
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy