Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 2011/01/02 4:15 PM  Italo Vignoli wrote:
Emails where people say that LibreOffice should not support a document format because it is backed by Microsoft or because is a Go-OO heritage are not a positive contribution.

So pointing out the Novell/Microsoft marketing agreement that led to the inclusion of writing to OOXML would not be a positive contribution?

Which version of OOXML does LibreOffice write to? The official standard approved version? Or one of the proprietary Microsoft versions? Which one? Or are these not positive inquiries

How about commenting on the articles criticizing OOXML? Oh right, that is not positive either. Besides it contravenes the Novell/Microsoft agreement.

Any comment on the Novell/Microsoft marketing agreement and how it affects the development of LibreOffice? Or would that not be positive either?

Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
"An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." - Edgard Varese

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.