Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

But why only for Thunderbird?

Why not make an open container (or just modularize the existing one with a
well defined interface) to will allow any application to use the resources
(e.g. dictionaries) and have full integration with all LO resources?


On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 20:36, Lee Hyde <anubeon@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
> > So, what am I saying?  You don't NEED to add something useless like
> > Outlook or Evolution to LO.  You just have to allow Thunderbird to
> > connect to it, and people can make their own choice as to whether they
> > want all the other bells and whistles.  Therefore, no increase in size
> > due to bundling but the advantage that those that WANT the extras can
> > have them without difficulty
>
> I agree, an integration add-on for Thunderbird (and any other e-mail
> clients or contact managers with an add-on architecture) would be a far
> better use of resources. Simply making contacts available to LibreOffice
> would do wonders for mail-merge luck functionality (for the life of me I
> can't think of any other functionalities one would require of an outlook
> clone).
>
> --
> "The division of mankind threatens it with destruction. Only universal
> cooperation under conditions of intellectual freedom and the lofty moral
> ideals of socialism and labor, accompanied by the elimination of
> dogmatism and pressure of the concealed interests of ruling classes,
> will preserve civilization."
>
>        -- Andrei Sakharov, The New York Times (July 22nd, 1968)
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
> discuss+help@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2Bhelp@documentfoundation.org>
> Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***