Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 2011-01-01 12:07 PM, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
A few points to remember though:
We are in a long-term goal to replace MS Office as the package 
of-choice. As part of the wider open-source fraternity, we are in
long-term campaign to remove Microsoft's influence and bring back
proper choice to the user.


So why is there so much duplication of effort in the campaign
against MS?

I strongly disagree with your assertion that we are or should be
engaging in any kind of 'campaign against Microsoft', or even that our
long term goal is or should be to 'replace Microsoft Office as the
package of choice...'

What I think we are or should be striving for is to simply be the best
Office/Productivity software available, whether free or commercial.

We do and should NOT have to put Microsoft Office Down in order to raise
ourselves up. If we cannot stand on our own to feet based solely on our
own merits, then we deserve to fall flat on our faces.

Obviously, I already believe that this is already where we are, or I
wouldn't be here.


Best regards,


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.