There are many times in which HTML doesn't translate correctly to a
recipient. The lowest common denominator, then, is plain text. That
being the case I habitually set my email reader to send in plain text.
Also, for one who uses gpg (or it's equivalent), even occasionally, the
encrypting and/or signing program automatically converts to plain text.
It isn't arrogance. It's the need to meet the needs of the greatest
number of people.
On 12/31/2010 11:31 AM, Carl Symons wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker
<gbplinux@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
And if you are sent an OOXML document to edit and return then it's bad
manners not to send it back in the format it was sent to you, just like it's
bad manners to receive a plain text email and reply in HTML....
How about if I receive an HTML email and reply in plain text? If
that's a faux pas, I've been a very bad boy.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.