Re: [tdf-discuss] [Change executable names] Re: Digest of discuss -AT- documentfoundation.org issue 127 (3742-3762)

Il 18/12/2010 14:21, MiguelAngel ha scritto:
> What is critical and impossible?
>
> The associations are with a executable file in a specific path.
> No problem for two files with same name in different paths.
> No problem to change the association to an executable file with the same
> name in a different path.
>
> Libo 3.3rc1 and OOo 3.3rc8 on same disk, also OOo 3.2.1 in a portable
> mode (3.2.1 over 3.2.0 portable)
>
> On 18/12/10 2:09, NoOp wrote:
> > On 12/17/2010 05:53 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
> > > As many others already commented, I believe it's time that LibreOffice
> > > changes the names of some of the individual applications, my humble
> > > proposal:
> > >
> > > Write
> > > Spread

I think "Calc" is better than "Spread" because point out the application 
main purpose that is to execute many *calcs* rather than being mainly 
(a) "spread" (sheet), isn't it?

However I think for 3.3 it is better to maintain the OOo names and then 
(3.4, 4.0, ...) rethinking icons, names and so on.

Carlo

> > > Present
> > > Draw
> > > Formula
> > > Base
> > This is critical when attempting to have OOo and LibO co-exist on Windows.
> >
> > - LO takes over all OOo application defaults&  icons.
> > - LO uses the same executable names as OOo (soffice.exe, swriter.exe,
> > etc). This makes it impossible to select an .odt and re-associate it
> > with OOo.

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***