I answered a posting from Ernst W. Winter:
Yes sounds good. How did the city of Munich change 14,000 PC to OOo?
with a somewhat cursory "I don't know" but the question piqued my interest.
A few minutes' Googling came up with the answer: It didn't.
Reports (e.g., at
http://blog.worldlabel.com/2009/limux-where-the-munich-linux-revolution-is-today.html)
show that only 80% of the city's 14,000 PCs will have been changed to open source by
2012 - that's EIGHT YEARS after the project was given the green light.
To be fair, Oo was only a small part of the changeover, which involved an upfront
cost of €13 million for LiMux, a special version of Linux. The council says that's
€2 million MORE than it would have cost to upgrade from Windows NT4 to XP,
but their point wasn't short-term financial saving -- they were more concerned about
being tied to a single supplier.
While a city council can apparently afford to spend this time and taxpayer's money
changing to open source, no corporate CFO would even consider it.
P.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
- [tdf-discuss] Re: Old Bugs (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.