Re: [tdf-discuss] LibO roadmap?

Le 2010-10-25 07:19, Sebastian Spaeth a écrit :
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:26:03 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 10:16 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > > but we need some special care for the research
> > > world that has been completely left out by OOo these past years.
>
> > Interesting, so would that mean more emphasis on Calc (charting) over
> > Writer?  maybe not, but research makes me thing of Calc.. guess that's
> > why I stopped to ask - what would you be doing to the code, if you where
> > looking to do some changes quickly _for the research ?world_ (academic
> > world / corp research world / market-pols research ..all)
>
> heck no :-)
>
> Real stats are going to be done in a stats package anyway :-). But
> writing articles, the academics' daily bread and butter in increasingly
> done in a full-fledged office suite (unless you happen to be in physics,
> engineering, or maths). Most of my article submissions to professionally
> managed journals are required in .doc format. Yes, really!
>
> But better citation management would be a boon. Mostly trying to help
> zotero to get its stuff done in OO, I guess. Support for
> collaboration would be a boon (something like abicollab.net), or
> something like ooosvn which supports revision systems for
> collaboration. And .doc .docs interoperability would be a boon.
>
> Just three tiny things this academic would love to see improved :).
>
> Sebastian

Hi Sebastien. Are you registered on the marketing mailist. If not, it 
would be great if you could join. I started a thread on he marketing 
mailist called "LibO in Academia" and I am collecting comments and 
improvement suggestions there. It would also be great if you could leave 
your comments on that thread.

Marc


--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted