Hi Marco, *
M. Fioretti schrieb:
Hi folks,
maybe this is a very stupid question or just a very naive one, but I
assure you that it is in good faith. Is this decision a surprise for
anybody?
Me, I've been seriously asking myself since september 28, every time I
saw some of the TDF founders posting around with an @openoffice.org
address or signature:
how can this guy still use this "hat" in public? Why is Oracle
allowing it?
As Oracle is part of the OpenOffice.org community, it should be bound to
the rules established (mainly by Sun Microsystems employees) for the
community: initiate votes to remove people they think not to represent
the community's will.
If they don't, I can't see how they want to speak for the community.
Oracle is trademark holder and contributor of the main part of the code
for OpenOffice.org. But if they behave as owner of the community public
reaction will be even more non-ambiguous than now.
Best regards
Bernhard
--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.