Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last

Hi Stefan, *,

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stefan Weigel
<> wrote:
Am 16.08.2012 15:03, schrieb Christian Lohmaier:

The only real thing that changes is that people need to use "reply to
all" instead of just "reply".

But people won´t use "reply to all". They will use "reply to list"

How can/will you know?
I know that gmail users will either reply to only the reporter or to all :-)

(just as I am doing right now). There still is the need to be
subscribed, if you want to get the answers to your posting, right?

If you decide to only reply to the list, and not to all, then it is
your choice to cut communication with any non-subscribers in that
current discussion.

It is your choice. But another one who notices can add back the
original poster in a reply.

don´t see the benefit you are talking about.

I can start writing in Japanese to this list if that makes you feel better.

(sorry, but I don't get the point in constructing corner cases. A few
moments ago people did complain "But my client doesn't have a
reply-to-list function!!!" and now you write that people absolutely
will only use reply-to-list. That just doesn't match up).

Alles wird heißer gekocht, als dass es dann gegessen wird.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.