Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last


Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2012-08-14 18:32:

Please don't!

Stick to your first decision and let it run at least for two weeks that way.

Changing it back now again for some lists only leads to more confusion.

do you think that is valid also for the users lists, where (more unexperienced) people really start to complain and whine?

The change of removing reply-to was introduced without prior
announcement (IMHO the biggest mistake about it).

Honestly, that was on purpose. The last times we discussed it it lead to endless discussions over and over again, putting me in between to chairs. I bet if I announced it before, the same would have happened this time, and honestly, I am tired of that...

If the LO lists would have started with that setting to begin with,
there wouldn't be loud complaining now.

That's indeed a valid argument.


Florian Effenberger, Chairman of the Board (Vorstandsvorsitzender)
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
The Document Foundation, Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details:

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.