Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last

Florian Effenberger wrote (08-04-11 10:47)

sophie wrote on 2011-04-08 09.07:
My opinion is that we are moderating subscriptions/spam, not real
content, so I'll let it through

I think so, too. We should only reject a message when:

1. It is insulting, criminal or by any other way really not for the lists
2. Someone posts without knowing that these are public mailing lists
3. It's spam

We should not be judging the content, as long as case #1 does not kick
in. :-)

Well, my idea was simple this:
- useless comment with the risk of offending people
- from someone who notably does not take trouble to subscribe normally.
So should I bother moderating that? I don't think so.

There are more people sending un-subscribed over and again, while they have been informed friendly by me (and maybe others) about that etc.
So I don't moderate those. I'm not a paid post-office employee here ;-)

BTW, since when do 'others' know what we discuss here ?


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.