No, there is no technical reason why I would like to have the new 1.3.3 version. This
'official' version would just create a clear situation, everybody would know exactly what
is inluded. People don't know what fixes these patches cover, they only see that there is an
outdated version!
"Caolán McNamara" <caolanm@redhat.com> írta:
On Sun, 2014-07-13 at 17:19 +0200, penttila wrote:
Hi, A new Hunspell version (1.3.3) is out since 2014 Jun 2, after more
than three years of development containing several bug fixes.
(http://hunspell.sourceforge.net)Will this new version be inluded in
the upcomming LibreOffice 4.3?
I can see that its still 1.3.2 in 4-3, but with 9 additional patches
over the "vanilla" 1.3.2, so if there's a particular problem in 1.3.2
which makes you want to have 1.3.3 instead then it may already be
covered by one of those backports.
C.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.