Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Happy Birthday, TDF!

2014-02-19 15:07 GMT+01:00 Jens Mildner <>:

Florian Effenberger wrote
Happy Birthday, Document Foundation!

Congratulations from my side, too! It's a pleasure to watch TDF grow and

But with TDF leaving its infancy, and a new board stepping up to continue
the success story, maybe it's time to share a thought or two about the

For me, there's two key points within TDF:

First is independence, the way the foundation is set up, the hard-coded
mixture rules for TDF's bodies, the democratic process, the donation-only
funding (combined with a careful financial planning and
only-spend-what-you-have attitude). Especially when I look at the other big
non-profit entity aiming at software for end users, Mozilla, I get the
strong gut feeling (without doing deeper research) that this independence
pure gold, and needs to be preserved no matter the cost.

The second point is transparency, which is key for building the trust
necessary to make donation-based funding models work, and therefore is key
for TDF's independence, too. I'm not only talking about transparency of the
decision-making process here, but also about financial transparency,
development transparency, and so forth.

And while TDF is already strong at both independence and transparency, it
could still be better. So I suggest the following things:

1) Official statement of affiliation by every member of any official body
TDF, if there's none already present.

2) TDF becoming a member of the "Initiative Transparente Zivilgesellschaft"
by Transparency Deutschland e. V., adhering to its 10-point code of

Having said that, I also think that TDF should broaden its scope of
development to truly "free" the desktop. In its values, it is stated that
TDF commits to "eliminate the digital divide in society by giving everyone
access to office productivity tools free of charge to enable them to
participate as full citizens in the 21st century". Personally, I think that
things like a browser, email client, and personal information manager
also be considered as being "office productivity tools", and therefore
should be offered by TDF in the long run, too.

This is even more true when I look at the current market for these kinds of
software. I've read many times that the one big thing missing from OOo/LO
an Outlook replacement, which would be a combined email client/PIM thingie.
And with Mozilla going into development directions that I call ambiguous at
best, the question about which browser to use on Windows could be hard to
answer in the not too distant future.

So, two years of TDF is surely a time to celebrate, but probably also a
for discussing the course to a future even brighter.

All the best,
Jens Mildner


​Contrary to Jens' point of view as expressed above, I'd like to suggest
that, at least for the near future, TDF confines its activities to working​

​to provide «everyone
access to office productivity tools free of charge», in accordance with
its​ statutes. This, which entails battling against Microsoft's entrenched
quasi-monopoly, is a more than sufficiently daunting task, which will
require all the efforts of which we are capable. Email clients, which in an
age in which people are continually connected to the internet, are of minor
use, are beyond its purview. Those who wish to use one can employ

Rather than do many things poorly, let us do one thing well !...


To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.