Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 26.07.2013 00:32, Toki Kantoor wrote:
On 07/25/2013 10:06 PM, theUser BL wrote:

The big question is: Why doing LibreOffice that?

The short answer is that the licenses that each organization uses allows
that to happen.

The longer answer is that free qua libre has implications that free qua
open does not have. Implications that the Apache Foundation is
apparently not willing to accept. Likewise, free qua open has
implications that free qua libre does not have. Implications that the
Document Foundation is apparently not willing to accept.

That's not the whole truth. The Apache licence doesn't contain a
copyleft clause - that's true.

But the MPL contains a very weak copyleft. The copyleft of the LGPL is
much stronger.

So: why does LibreOffice use the MPL?

Think about it!


To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.