On 07/25/2013 10:06 PM, theUser BL wrote:
The big question is: Why doing LibreOffice that?
The short answer is that the licenses that each organization uses allows
that to happen.
The longer answer is that free qua libre has implications that free qua
open does not have. Implications that the Apache Foundation is
apparently not willing to accept. Likewise, free qua open has
implications that free qua libre does not have. Implications that the
Document Foundation is apparently not willing to accept.
Whether or not those organizations will adopt a license other than they
currently use, depends upon how well somebody can convince the
organization, in its entirety, to accept the limitations of the new
license, and its attendant vices, forgoing the virtues of the license
that it currently uses.
FWIW, I think that the discussion of the vices, and virtues of the
respective licenses belongs in a different place. Alt.flame would be
where I'd point you to.
jonathon
--
LibreOffice in a Multi-Lingual Environment.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.