On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster <
webmaster@krackedpress.com> wrote:
Spending money, via donations, geared to one feature and not the whole
package can be a VERY bad marketing issue.
I never liked it. If you donate money to one feature and it does not get
added, or fixed, in "your time line" and not the developer's, it can be a
mess.
We do not know what can be fixed easily, or if something that looks simple
will be a real hard add or fix. The simple things tend to be not so simple.
We cannot even make a paper trail to show an agency [required by] that the
donation towards a "feature" would even go to it. That would make a big
legal mess.
Paying a third party to "fix" things has been used by spammers for a long
time.
+1 to all that, but I think offering a payment and letting a developer opt
in or out is fine. As long as user and developer understand LibreOffice has
no part in the process.
Best,
Joel
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.