Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Charles Jenkins <> wrote:
I'm with you on the UI design, Keith. The way software looks influences how people perceive its 
capability, and LO looks like something from the 90's. I like your design because it's 
attractive, yet leaves the menus in place for those users who can't get into using the ribbon.

Now on the idea of removing VBA… I hate VBA, but I'd rather see LO become *more* compatible, 
rather than ditching it. I want LO to become the product people can switch to, but you close the 
door on switchers when you reduce compatibility. I can tell you that for sure because of my own 
recent difficulties fixing a macro so automated data export from SAP will work with LO.

Step 1: Get the world to use LO as its Office standard.
Step 2: Drop M$ Office compatibility.

I agree that improving VBA compatibility would be helpful, my point
was about extensions written by volunteers.



Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.