On 03/10/2013 01:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
unable to get a simple answer should be proof-positive
You were given an official answer.
have also have been unable to get a clear, official answer as well.
If the code is crap, it doesn't matter what license is used, it will not
be accepted.
If the code is good, then the issue is whether or not it is distributed
with the license that LibO is distributed under, or compatible with that
licence.
jonathon
--
Email with a precedence of other than "junk", "bulk", or "list" is
automatically forwarded to Dave Null. Those emails will never be seen by me.
* English - detected
* English
* English
<javascript:void(0);>
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Dual licensing of patches and code (continued)
Re: [tdf-discuss] Dual licensing of patches and code · Simon Phipps
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.