Re: [tdf-discuss] macro compatibility between LO and AOO?

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Fernand Vanrie <sos@pmgroup.be> wrote:
> On 4/03/2013 8:27, M. Fioretti wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 08:16:25 AM +0100, Fernand Vanrie wrote:
> >
> > > 99% percent , changes comes and will come from incompatiliteis in de API.
> > > for now this is OK, small changes from version to version, but
> > > nothing who not can been repaired or handled with the code( basic)
> > > itself
> >
> > I knew that. The sense of my question is, is there is a list of things
> > to avoid beforehand, rather than wait that they break and fix the
> > code?
>
> thats more a question for the developers list .
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org  and fore the aOO counterpart
> ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> > Thanks,
> > Marco

The reason why nobody responded is no one knows, and it will generally
get worse over time as the codebases diverge. It is sort of like the
Java: "write once, test everywhere" situation.

One of the unintended consequences of the fork is the various ways it
makes things more difficult for third-parties. Users will generally
pick one product, but extension developers have a more complicated set
of choices because they may want to support multiple brands. Here is
an article I recently wrote about the power of brands that may be
helpful: http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=3163

The good news is that in the free software world, code flows with less
friction. Any typical (non-enterprise) who really wants an extension
will likely be able to install a specific version of the product if it
is required. It is just a download.

Good luck!

Regards,

-Keith

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted